Does the OHS Act require every business to employ a full-time safety officer?

No. The Act requires competent people to be properly appointed to specific health and safety functions, but it does not specify employment status. Section 16(1) places accountability on the chief executive personally, and Section 16(2) allows duties to be assigned to others, including an outsourced provider. Construction has a sharper rule under the Construction Regulations, but even there the appointment can be full-time or part-time depending on project risk.

Is outsourcing actually cheaper than hiring someone?

Usually, once you account for the full cost of employment rather than base salary alone. Benefits, UIF, leave, training, recruitment, equipment and cover during absence all add to what one employee costs. An outsourced provider typically charges a fixed monthly fee while covering a broader range of expertise than one person can hold.

If we outsource our OHS function, does that reduce our legal liability?

Not entirely. Section 16(2) of the OHS Act lets you assign duties to an outsourced provider, but Section 16(1) keeps ultimate accountability with your chief executive. Outsourcing gives you competent people and proper systems, which is what the law actually asks for, but it does not transfer the underlying responsibility away from your business.

What happens if our in-house safety officer resigns?

You lose their site knowledge immediately and are left covering the gap while you recruit and onboard a replacement, which commonly takes weeks or months given how scarce properly qualified candidates are. During that gap your legal exposure continues. An outsourced arrangement does not create this problem, since the relationship, records and coverage continue regardless of individual staff changes.

Can an outsourced provider work across sites in different provinces?

Yes, and this is one of the clearer advantages for businesses with more than one location. Pro Safety is KwaZulu-Natal based and services clients across South Africa, including Johannesburg and Cape Town, giving multi-site businesses one consistent standard and one point of contact instead of separate arrangements for each site.

Can we combine an employed safety coordinator with an outsourced provider?

Yes, and this hybrid model is common. A junior employee handles daily on-site presence, toolbox talks and PPE checks, while an outsourced provider supplies registered professional oversight, audits and administrative record-keeping around them. It gives smaller sites professional-level assurance without paying a senior salary for what is largely a junior, on-site role.

Hiring a Safety Officer vs Outsourcing Your OHS Function

Both routes can satisfy the law. Both can fail you if chosen for the wrong reasons. This page is here to help you work out which fits your sites, your sector and your risk profile.

Most business owners land on this question the same way. A client asks for proof of a dedicated safety resource, an inspector flags a gap, or the person quietly doing the paperwork alongside their real job has finally said they cannot keep it up. The instinct is to advertise the post. That is one option, not the only one, and for many businesses it is neither the cheapest nor the most reliable.

This page is not here to talk you out of hiring someone. Below you will find the cases where employing in-house is genuinely the better answer, stated as plainly as the cases where it is not.

What the law actually requires

The Occupational Health and Safety Act, Act 85 of 1993, does not use the words “safety officer” and does not require every employer to have one. What it requires is competence and proper appointment. A competent person is defined by their knowledge, training and experience for the task, not by whether they appear on your payroll.

Section 16(1) places the core employer duties personally on the chief executive officer. Section 16(2) allows the chief executive to assign specific duties to others, including an external provider, but the accountability itself cannot be handed off. Section 37 provides for vicarious liability, and Section 38 sets penalties reaching R100,000 or two years imprisonment. None of this changes based on whether your appointed people are employees or contracted specialists.

Construction is the one sector with a sharper rule. Under the Construction Regulations, a principal contractor must appoint a construction health and safety officer registered with the SACPCMP, having weighed the size of the project and the risks involved. Depending on that assessment the appointment can be full-time or part-time. What the regulation insists on is registration and competence, which an outsourced registered professional satisfies as well as an employed one.

The true cost of an in-house safety officer

The number most owners budget against is the advertised salary. Published figures for South African safety officers vary considerably by source, experience and sector, broadly from around R180,000 a year for a junior or generalist role towards R400,000 or more for a senior registered specialist in a higher-risk industry. Treat any single figure as indicative rather than precise. The point is what sits underneath it.

What the advertised salary does not include

Benefits and statutory contributions. UIF, and typically medical aid or provident fund if you offer them.
Paid leave. Annual, sick and family responsibility leave are days the role is unstaffed while the wage still runs.
Training and continuing development. SACPCMP registration requires ongoing professional development. Let it lapse and the registration goes with it, so this spend is not optional.
Recruitment. Advertising, agency fees, interview time, and the weeks or months it takes to find someone properly qualified in a scarce market.
Equipment and overheads. PPE, laptop, phone, software, and travel or a vehicle allowance if the role covers more than one site.
Management time. Someone still has to set direction, review the work, and step in on anything outside that person’s experience.
Cover during absence. Sick leave, annual leave, parental leave and notice periods all create gaps. Your legal exposure continues through every one of them.
Single point of failure. One person holds one set of experience. A generalist hired for a manufacturing site may be out of their depth on a mining regulation, and closing that gap means more training or outside help anyway.

Add these together and the true annual cost of one in-house safety officer is meaningfully higher than the advertised salary, and it buys you the judgement and availability of one individual.

What you get with each

Dimension	In-house safety officer	Outsourced OHS department
Coverage during leave and illness	Gap in coverage while they are out. Someone else must cover or the function pauses.	Continuity is the provider’s responsibility. Work does not stop because one person is away.
Breadth of expertise	Limited to one person’s training, experience and specialisation.	Access to registered professionals for strategy and audit, coordinators for site work, and administrative specialists.
Administrative capacity	Records, reporting and documentation compete with site duties for the same person’s time.	Handled by a dedicated administrative function, separate from on-site work.
Cost predictability	Base salary is fixed, but leave cover, training, recruitment and turnover costs are variable and often underestimated.	Fixed monthly fee agreed up front.
Scalability across sites	Each additional site generally needs its own appointment, or an existing person stretched thinner.	Scales with the number and risk profile of your sites without a new hire each time.
Continuity when someone resigns	Institutional knowledge leaves with them. Recruitment and onboarding start again from zero.	The provider retains the relationship, records and history regardless of individual staff changes.

When hiring in-house is the right answer

A large single site with constant high-risk activity. Heavy manufacturing across multiple shifts, an active mine, or a large continuous construction site needs someone who knows that site, its plant and its people daily. That depth is hard to replicate through periodic visits.
Work happening every hour of every shift. If you need a safety presence physically on site around the clock, you need the headcount to cover that roster.
Contracts that specifically require a named, full-time employed officer. Some mining and large industrial contracts stipulate this. If your client contract says it, the decision is made for you.
You are large enough to justify a full internal department. At sufficient scale, employing strategy, coordination and administration internally can cost about the same and gives you more direct control.

When outsourcing is the right answer

One site, or a few, that does not justify a full-time specialist. If your risk profile needs regular attention but not a person there every hour, a full salary buys far more capacity than you use.
Multiple sites across different locations. Separate hires per site are expensive and hard to keep consistent. One provider gives you one standard and one point of contact.
You need audit-level expertise without carrying that seniority on payroll. Registered professionals capable of running proper audits command salaries hard to justify for occasional, high-value work.
Turnover has burned you before. If a resignation previously left you exposed while you recruited, an outsourced arrangement removes that single point of failure.
You are growing and do not want fixed headcount. An outsourced arrangement flexes. A permanent hire is much harder to reverse.

The hybrid option

Many businesses do not choose one model exclusively. A common and often sensible arrangement is to employ someone junior on site, handling daily toolbox talks, PPE checks, incident logging and the physical presence a site needs, while outsourcing the layers above and around them.

In practice the registered professional layer sets strategy, runs audits and reviews the appointments and systems your on-site person works within, while an administrative specialist keeps records and reporting correct. Your employee gets support they would otherwise take years to build, and you get professional assurance without paying a senior salary for a junior role, or asking one person to be your site presence, compliance strategist and record-keeper at once.

Common questions

There is no single right answer, only the right one for your operation

Talk it through with us and we will tell you plainly which model we think fits your sites and your risk profile, even if that means recommending you hire someone.

Call 067 612 1132 Start a Conversation